I feel that Michaell's will provides very strong additional evidence contradicting another of Lazaris' lies on the Healing the Broken Alliance tapes.

On the tape Lazaris talks about how Michaell had a unique and unparalleled commitment and integrity.

There is no way I can get past the fact that a father could choose to give the Republican National Party his money before he would give any to his own daughter who he abandoned when she was very young. This act alone shows a flagrant disregard for commitment. Add to that the abandonment of his parents, brother and ex-wife and you have quite a picture. I normally wouldn't include the comment about the ex-wife as our society generally accepts such acts of abandonment even when kids are involved. However, we know from their own example that an ex-spouse can be treated as a human being.

The other part of the lie is about integrity. As I posted elsewhere, one of his last couple of sentences (about no one else knowing about his plans) from his suicide note was untrue. And then we have the whole matter of Tradevest and other MLM's...

Cheers, Craig

I haven't read Michaell's will yet, but I assume he included the same twentieth item in his will

quote:

---

I have knowingly and intentionally omitted and not provided herein for my natural heirs or persons claiming to be such heirs, living at the time of my death, whether or not known to me. In addition, if any beeficiary named herein, in any manner, directly or indirectly, contests or attacks this Last Will and Testament or any of it's provisions, any interest in my estate herein granted to that contesting beneficiary is revoked and shall be disposed of in the same manner provided herein as if that contesting beneficiary had predeceased me without issue.

---

Nice one. Am I reading correctly that not only did Peny EXPLICITLY exclude any family members, but also revokes Jach's inheritance should he contest the will in the event that Michaell lived to collect the goods?

More beautiful "love and peace" from Peny.

Katie

You'll see that the Twentieth article in in Michaell's is slightly different than Peny's. It says,

quote:

---

I have knowingly and intentionally omitted and not provided herein for my natural
heirs, including without limitation my brother and his issue, or persons claiming to be such heirs, living at the time of my death, whether or not known to me.

---

Seems pretty odd to specifically mention his brother and the brother's offspring, but not mention his daughter. Maybe he was too ashamed. In some states, I don't know about Florida, the will must specifically mention by name, direct heirs (children) who have been left out. Otherwise they can sue and win a portion of the estate. A blanket phrase does not suffice in those states.

Well, these "spiritual" folks didn't leave a dime to a soul beyond each other and, ultimately their politcal party. No relatives, friends, faithful employees, charities, spiritual foundations.

It appears that their highest ideals are represented by the magic of the Republican Party. Some metaphysicians.

Jade

quote:

---

The 2001 Florida Statutes

Title XLII
Estates And Trusts
Chapter 732
Probate Code: Intestate Succession And Wills
View Entire Chapter

732.302 Pretermitted children.--When a testator omits to provide by will for any of his or her children born or adopted after making the will and the child has not received a part of the testator's property equivalent to a child's part by way of advancement, the child shall receive a share of the estate equal in value to that which the child would have received if the testator had died intestate, unless:

(1) It appears from the will that the omission was intentional; or

(2) The testator had one or more children when the will was executed and devised
substantially all the estate to the other parent of the pretermitted child and that other parent survived the testator and is entitled to take under the will.

The share of the estate that is assigned to the pretermitted child shall be obtained in accordance with s. 733.805.

---

I wonder how a judge would look at a will in which the testator mentions a brother and his family, but not even the existence his daughter -- the sole direct heir. A statement like this about the brother and "issue" proves intention.

There is no such mention, or statement of "intention" about the daughter, as if she never existed. I don't believe that the blanket statment about omitting natural heirs is enough intention.

I have personally witnessed an offspring, who was not mentioned in a parent's will, claim and receive a large inheritance this way.

Not to say that its a sure thing, but certainly worth looking into. Personally I'd be happy as hell to see Michaell's daughter get a big chunk of his estate. (And since Peny died first, leaving everything to Michaell before Jack, how about a hummungous amount from both wills.)

And Jach didn't tell the police about the daughter. They were all trying to pretend her out of existence. What loving adults would ever perpetrate this kind of situation?

Jade

Michaell's daughter was adopted by someone else, allegedly at Peny's insistance. Therefore she has no right to a claim in Michaell's estate.

It would seem ethical and decent though, for Jach to provide for her in some way nevertheless.

It's hard to ignore the cult-like behavior here, given that Jach also allegedly cut off all ties with his family for 30 odd years, reportedly not even attending his parent's funerals. Word has it that he's been making attempts to reunite with his siblings now.

Interesting if it's true that all of a sudden he's interested in his family again, now that Peny is gone.

What kind of a woman would insist that her husband abandon his family and children? Peny is the stuff horror novels are written of.

Katie