Dear Lurkers and All,Rick Ross, a cult expert offers a very interesting set of criteria for defining a cult and determining whether a cult is destructive or not. His site is www.rickross.com.
Many of the criteria fit CS like a glove.
Maybe we can discuss others if anyone is interested. I just have time right now to write about the first.
Anyway the first sign of cult activity according to Ross is :
**1.A charismatic leader--who increasingly becomes an object of worship as the general principles that may have originally sustained the group lose power.*****
Lazaris certainly fits this profile. The initial focus is appealing to most. Who doesn't want to learn to manifest more powerfully? Experience a greater spiritual connection ?
The focus has clearly shifted now to the "Lazaris Personality" and the Lazaris "myth of eternal love".
As the follower grows more and more disenchanted with his or her inability to reconcile the teaching that success is natural and fun with the frustration of trying to incorporate baroque, complex manifestation and healing techniques to create that success, a sense of despair and an erosion of confidence results.
The inadequacy and inconsistency that really belong to Lazaris are internalized by the follower.
The follower who carries this flaw must inevitably return to the only source now trustworthy for counsel.. Lazaris.
Tape after tape, workshop after workshop desperately trying to expiate the doubt and sense of failure implanted by the teaching itself.
The followers turn their gaze to the Lazaris "personality" that offers them comfort and reassurance.
How many times have we heard in recent years Lazaris soothing and reassuring us that we are not "terrible and awful" not "stupid" when we fail to meet our goals.
Yes, I agree we are not "terrible and awful" or stupid. Who ever said we were???
It was a real eye opener for me to realize that when Lazaris is reassuring us about how we are "not" something [horrible, stupid, failure etc] he is actually conditioning us to believe we are.
Those not prone to that kind of self recrimination are encouraged to feel they might be "missing something" by not beating themselves up.
Those who are so inclined, simply do what comes naturally. Either way the coffers are full for the next workshop of people hungry to fix the flaw that stands between them and total abundance joy and happines.
A merry go round with Lazaris in the middle.
Why do people get snowed into believing that this "entity" loves them when many who have been attending workshops for years still haven't been granted a personal consultation?
Where is the evidence of all this love? Just because Jach/Lazaris says in a breathy longing voice how much they love us, we are to accept it?
We have been conditioned to not question the quality or the fact of Lazaris love.
Yet where was all this love when Jach and Peny were conning people with tradevest?
Where was all this love when people were being bloodied in the forum?
Where is all this love when significant numbers of workshop attendees go into serious financial debt to attend these bullshit workshops on Lemuria and King Arthur.
Where is all this love when his anointed Dolly Mama Peny North tells a follower she would like to slap her for questioning Jach?
Where is all this love for us when Lazaris allows Jach and Peny to use his name to financially gauge and already bled-dry customer with crystals and paraphernalia way, way over the usual retail markup?
Love? hardly even by Lazaris own defintion of love. Where is the caring, compassion in any of those activities?
People no doubt create wonderful things in their lives and attribute it to the love of Lazaris rather than their own increasing grasp of metaphysics. Another disempowering tool. When you do something great, Lazaris gets the credit. When you do something not great you take the blame.
Sounds like a description from the early Lazaris material of a person who takes only selective responsiblity.
Cheers,
Jeremiah
[This message has been edited by Jeremiah (edited 02-10-2001).]
[This message has been edited by Jeremiah (edited 02-10-2001).]
[This message has been edited by Jeremiah (edited 02-10-2001).]